Ещё непонятно по разгону, везде противоречивая инфа 1700 и 1700х гонятся одинаково или нет

Обсуждение CPU должно быть в профильной ветке раздела "Процессоры".

Так там нету там темы то пока, вроде.

разгон это лотерея, даже одинаковые модели гонятся по разному..

Короче надо по сусекам статистику скребсти, пока не ясно.

однако есть и отзывы, что 1700 берёт со скрипом 3,9

Понятное дело, но ведь так сказать математическое ожидание частот разгона разное. Была же перед анонсом информация, что их отбирают по VID, кто-то сейчас опровергает, однако есть и отзывы, что 1700 берёт со скрипом 3,9, взять хоть последнее видео от Paul Software. Короче надо по сусекам статистику скребсти, пока не ясно.

Hi there

So we test 1700 and 1800X both at 4.0GHz and both performed identically. So chips are indeed identical.

Also on multi-threaded performance memory clock is more beneficial than outright core speed, so 3000MHz is an ideal RAM speed and focus on tightening the timings.

Видео нужно кидать на достоверные источники, например Digital Foundry.

You answered your own question then, AMD if your concerned mainly about price / performance, you are probably looking at longetivity as well I guess?

If so then AMD is the clear winner.

Also @Scramz has a 1700 running on a B350 mortar motherboard at 3.9ghz, stable and cool.

So no, you don't need just the X370 boards, personally though I would wait a week or so for some more board to be rated and tested, it's clear the 1700 is the goto AMD CPU but motherboards are in short supply so not all have been tested yet and hardly any reviewed extensively

3800mhz @ 1.25 volts stock cooler - stable. Here's the CPU-z single thread benchmark, think it saves it is here (hopefully) http://valid.x86.fr/bench/41w797/1 . Front page http://valid.x86.fr/41w797

Single thread i7 7700k gets 2301, my Ryzen 1770 gets 2213, the i7 6700k gets 2144.

I could probably go to 3.9 or higher but it begins to cook. However, if you saw how much acoustic foam was in my case you wouldn't be surprised. I'm still waiting for my AM4 bracket from Noctua to arrive.

Так что B350 + R7 1700 неплохой комплект по цене выходит.

When we overclocked the Ryzen 7 1700 CPU up to 4GHz with 1.3875V we used the Corsair Hydro 110i Extreme Performance Liquid CPU Cooler ($134.99 shipped) to ensure our temperatures were okay. AIDA64 showed that we were idling at just 25C and at load we were at 63C.

One would think that the temperatures on the water cooler would slowly creep up over time, but we went from ~28C to 60C instantly and the Corsair H110i was able to hold them there. Once we stopped the AIDA64 stress test six minutes later (short because we wanted to get this article done before the weekend) the temperatures dropped back down to 25C in less than 10 seconds. Pretty impressive!

Судя по обзорам у камней R7 1800x температуры даже в idle около 60 градусов,это на их чудных кулерах с гирляндой по ходу.

An AMD Ryzen 1700 processor with a Wraith cooler runs $329 and you are looking at around $130 for a nicely loaded AMD B350 motherboard, so for around $459 you can have a nice core platform for your new 8-core 16-thread Ryzen system at less than half the price of just a bare Intel Core i7-6900K processor. This might be the sleeper processor that enthusiasts have been waiting for. Could this be the equivalent of the Athlon XP AGOIA stepping processor that Generation X grew up, but for the next generation of PC users?

Legit Bottom Line: The performance numbers for the Ryzen 7 1700 overclocked to 4GHz are impressive, but they might not be representative of the processors full capabilities once AMD gets some more optimizations rolled out. This is the starting point for Ryzen!

for a nicely loaded AMD B350 motherboard