Никакого восторга

сейчас поиграю немного

Фанатам красного посвящается.
Секта Odyssey G7 уничтожает OLED

Фанатам красного посвящается

Судя по этому тесту у G7 тупо насыщенность больше выкручена по дефолту,

Novvv у асуса яркость под 1000 Нит,

Тест просто щииикарный Видно, что профессиАналы работают.

Unfortunately, the current test methodology for DisplayHDR, known as DisplayHDR CTS 1.1, has some serious limitations. Instead of using industry-standard test methods for things like contrast and local dimming, the VESA group has chosen to create their own test suite (available for free from the Microsoft Store). Although most of their tests reflect real-world usage, some of them, including their checkerboard test, are done in a way that even basic monitors with limited or even no local dimming can achieve easily. One example of this issue is with the Sceptre C345B-QUN168, which, as pointed out by Hardware Unboxed, can't display HDR content very well, despite being certified DisplayHDR 1000.

Due to these limitations in the testing methodology, the current testing standards for DisplayHDR are mainly helpful for brightness, as the contrast measurements and requirements are easily achievable by basic monitors with no local dimming. Since one of the main goals of HDR is to display bright and dark areas on screen at the same time, this is a significant limitation of the current test methodology, and their current contrast testing doesn't reflect real-world HDR usage. Because of this flawed test methodology, there are many IPS monitors with low contrast and basic, edge-lit local dimming features that are certified for the higher tiers of DisplayHDR, even though very few of them can deliver an impactful HDR experience.

REVIEW SAMPLES
Since manufacturers have to submit prerelease products to VESA for certification, they can cherry-pick the sample unit that gets sent. These samples could perform better than the final retail units, so a product certified for a certain tier possibly doesn't meet the specifications needed on the final retail units.

FAKE HDR RATINGS
Unfortunately, there have been a few reports of some manufacturers using misleading advertising to make it seem like their products perform better than they should. Recently, a few monitors were listed on online shopping stores with a DisplayHDR 2000 logo, claiming to be certified by the VESA group as DisplayHDR 2000 certified, although no such certification currently exists. The VESA group is looking into these claims but has released a statement on their website confirming that no such certification program exists.

Conclusion
Although it's not perfect, the VESA DisplayHDR Certification provides potential buyers with a rough idea of what to expect when buying a new monitor. HDR support on monitors is still very limited, though, and the vast majority of monitors fall into the lowest level, which offers mediocre HDR performance at best. There are a few monitors that can deliver a decent HDR experience, though, especially if you're planning on using it for gaming instead of watching movies. In the end, it's important to look at the real performance of the display instead of only looking at the certifications. The VESA group's latest test methodology is from 2019, meaning as the monitor industry continues to improve, with new technologies like QD-OLED and IPS Black, they'll likely update their methodology to better reflect the current state of the industry. For now, it's a good place to start, even if it can't quite tell you the full story.

У Нео так то тоже никаких 1000 или 500 нит нет на 100% окне.

Это ты к чему процитировал?

HDR на простом G7 сравнивают с оледом...даже не смешно.

По делу то есть что сказать?

че делать будешь?

Хотя иди-ка ты в игнор.