Что то финальный вариант вообще от GPU Fiji не отличается
Хотя нет , эта карта будет куда быстрее -все же новый техпроцесс, новая архитектура , новая память HBM2 , 17 ярдов транзюков .

Вчера читал обзорчик супер -пупер нерефа 980Ti -там Фура на 32% отстала в разгоне обеих карт .

от стоковой Fury X с её тихой и эффективной СВО

Fury X с её тихой и эффективной СВО

жирненько

я все же надеюсь что нв не выпустит чип в 600мм2 на 16нм просто это самое бестолковое решение

поддержку NVLink на уровне центральных процессоров обеспечат лишь решения IBM или продукты с архитектурой ARM

Can we stop saying GP100 (high end Pascal) will come out Q2 2016, it will be low end first, not high end Pascal, I will keep posting this till authors actually read it.

One is the 16nm fab is new...and untested...and you can't go large and power hungry on first generation chips. Don't believe how unreliable a new fab is? Look at how long it took Nvidia to pick between Samsung and TSMC and finally siding with TSMC due to their longer working history and reliability.

Second point is...they will kill their own sales by offering their best card right at the release of the new generation. They will not be able to give any reason at all to their enthusiast market to upgrade their card within 3 years of launch. Whereas when you look at Kepler, people bought the 680, then the Titan came out, then the 780, and most people who bought the 680 eventually upgraded to those cards. And then when Maxwell launched, they started with just the 750 and 750ti. Then released the 980 that some bought, and finally after a while, the Titan X and 980ti which gave people (enthusiast market, again) a reason to upgrade.

Nvidia likes incremental upgrades. They don't want you to buy a card now, and launch another card in a year that completely destroys the card you bought. They put out one card, then 12 months later they bring out another card that is generally just 10-20% faster, so it's better than what they offered before, but not enough to piss off anyone who bought their last gen cards. And then another 6-12 months later they put out an even better card, with 50%+ better performance than their older cards, and people start upgrading again.

If on day one of the Pascal launch, if they come out with their absolute best card, they are going to have nothing interesting to bring to market for 2 to 3 years until Volta comes out. And that would be silly. Even if it were possible with the new 16nm fab. In terms of business, you need to offer a product that is a bit better than your competition, without being too much better/too costly for you. So they just need to put out a slight performance increase, but sell the card on much lower power consumption, wait for AMD to release something else, and then launch a bigger die version themselves, and back/forth they go. Just a quick reference:

FERMI
-----------
GTX 580 = 520mm2

KEPLER
-------------
GTX 680 = 294mm2
GTX Titan = 551mm2

MAXWELL
---------------
GTX 750ti = 148mm2
GTX 980 = 398mm2
GTX Titan X = 601mm2

Do you see the pattern? Small, Medium, Big, restart. Don't think about it based on die size. Because it's really just about transistor count. Pascal at 16nm, even a 294mm2 sized die like the GTX 680, along with HBM2, would result in performance close to the Titan X...and perhaps even higher due to lower heat/power consumption allowing higher clocks.
Hope that helps.

Где те, кто так ждал NVlink???

Предполагается, что выпускаться GP100 будет по 16-нм технологии с применением FinFET на мощностях TSMC, площадь кристалла составит 500-600 кв.мм, а количество транзисторов достигнет 17 млрд. штук. С памятью HBM2 объёмом 16-32 ГБ графический процессор будет сообщаться при помощи 4096-разрядной шины

Жирненько - это когда кто то тявкает про шумную помпу, где доказательством приводится открытый стенд с кучей других шумов от других комплектующих и микрофоном на расстоянии 10 см

с памятью hbm и GPS на нем?

Подскажите пожалуйста, что такое:
разъем типа "Mezzanine"